13 research outputs found

    A New Secure Authentication Protocol for Telecare Medicine Information System and Smart Campus

    Full text link
    © 2013 IEEE. Telecare Medicine Information System (TMIS)'s security importance attracts a lot of attention these days. Whatever the security of TMIS improves, its application becomes wider. To address this requirement, recently, Li et al. proposed a new privacy-preserving RFID authentication protocol for TMIS. After that, Zhou et al. and also Benssalah et al. presented their scheme, which is not secure, and they presented their new authentication protocol and claim that their proposal can provide higher security for TMIS applications. In this stream, Zheng et al. proposed a novel authentication protocol with application in smart campus, including TMIS. In this paper, we present an efficient impersonation and replay attacks against Zheng et al. with the success probability of 1 and a desynchronization attack which is applicable against all of the rest three mentioned protocols with the success probability of 1-2^{-n} , where n is the protocols parameters length. After that, we proposed a new protocol despite these protocols can resist the attacks presented in this paper and also other active and passive attacks. Our proposed protocol's security is also done both informally and formally through the Scyther tool

    On the traceability of tags in SUAP RFID authentication protocols

    No full text
    RFID technology is one of the most pervasive computing technologies with important advantages and a wide range of applications. Nevertheless, the widespread adoption of RFID technology mainly depends on fixing the security and privacy concerns of this technology. Using a tagged object should not lead to the traceability of this object. This concern is a challenging issue that has motivated the proposal of several authentication protocols that attempted to fix the traceability problem. In this paper, we analyze the security of three authentication protocols that have been recently proposed by Morshed et al. [2]. Our security analysis clearly highlights important security pitfalls in these protocols that lead to their vulnerability against traceability. The proposed attacks require only several runs of the protocols while the adversary\u27s advantages to trace the tagged object are maximal. \ua9 2012 IEEE

    Weaknesses in another Gen2-based RFID authentication protocol

    No full text
    There is a high need for secure authentication protocols conforming with the EPC Class-1 Generation 2 (Gen2 in short) standard. The security analyses of the new born authentication protocols provide some guidelines and lessons that should be considered in the design of new proposals. In this paper, we scrutinize the security of a Gen2 based RFID authentication protocol which has been recently proposed by Yi et al. [8]. Our security analysis highlights important security pitfalls in this proposal. More precisely, we show a simple approach to desynchronize the tag and the reader. Moreover, we present tag impersonation and reader impersonation attacks. Finally, we show how the use of random numbers does not prevent traceability attack. The success probability of all the proposed attacks is 1 and their complexity is minimal since at most one eavesdropped session of the protocol is required. \ua9 2012 IEEE

    Desynchronization and traceability attacks on RIPTA-DA protocol

    No full text
    Recently Gao et al. proposed a lightweight RFID mutual authentication protocol [3] to resist against intermittent position trace attacks and desynchronization attacks and called it RIPTA-DA. They also verified their protocol’s security by data reduction method with the learning parity with noise (LPN) and also formally verified the functionality of the proposed scheme by Colored Petri Nets. In this paper, we investigate RIPTA-DA’s security. We present an efficient secret disclosure attack against the protocol which can be used to mount both de-synchronization and traceability attacks against the protocol. Thus our attacks show that RIPTA-DA protocol is not a RIPTA-DA
    corecore